As a new teacher I wonder if there will ever be time to
appropriately plan for an integrated lesson?
Working backwards in the UbD* method seems like a very time consuming process to plan a unit for teaching. Just trying to come up with essential
questions for a unit takes a lot of thinking, brainstorming, writing, critiquing,
and rewriting time. Although I think the actual
process of planning an integrated unit would be very enjoyable - trying
to match concepts that correlate across subjects, imagining activities to
implement integrated learning, etc. - indulging in the time it takes for planning an integrated
unit as a new teacher may be unfeasible with all of the demands a new teacher
faces.
I’m also concerned about staying on track with the
curriculum map for the year. Will my
students and I get so deeply involved on a loosely related subject to the integrated
learning unit that we don’t cover the standards, or will we cover the material
so broadly, trying to incorporate a little of this subject and a little of that
subject, that we barely learn the material that will be tested? I can see myself, “falling off the horse” on
both sides of teaching integrated units.
Or I wonder will the constrains of a particular school’s curriculum
mapping make it next to impossible for me to teach interdisciplinary units, as
I try to stay on track teaching each day’s assignments?
I’m also concerned about how integrated teaching will be
received by the other teachers at my school. Ideally, what I’ve seen from the UbD method,
(Wiggins and McTighe, The Understanding
by Design Guide to Creating High-Quality Units”), and Dr. Heidi Hayes Jacob’s
online workshop on “Interdisciplinary Learning in the Classroom”, http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/interdisciplinary/exploration.html
as well as lectures in my course at Meredith, “Teaching and
Integrating Social Studies and the Arts,” I’ve seen that integrating teaching
works well (maybe even best) when teachers collaborate. Will my peers be willing to plan and teach
integrated units with me? As a new
teacher what kind of input will my fellow experienced teachers allow me to have in
planning?
Overall, I am very interested and committed to trying to
implement integrated teaching/learning in the classroom. I plan on taking baby steps towards integrated planning and implementing teaching units as a new teacher. I also hope I’ll be
undaunted in the face of any opposition that I might encounter in an integrating
teaching approach in my classroom because I believe strongly in the efficacy of integrated teaching on students' learning.
A look at Integrated Studies from Edutopia
As to why integrated teaching, although documented as valid and
“highly-touted in the research", is not seen that often in schools, I think the
fear of not appropriately teaching the standards that will be assessed by formalized testing is
probably the number one reason. By spending
time on subjects that will not be assessed by high-stakes testing through
integrating teaching, i.e. social studies, teachers and administrators may feel
that time is wasted or lost on those subjects, instead of devoting time teaching and
learning the subjects that will be tested. Second, I think role models for integrating
teaching are important for teachers to feel comfortable with this method,
especially when they need a mentor to confer with about concerns and ideas for
implementation, or are using UbD and integrating teaching approaches for the
first time. If there were more teachers
in the field using integrating teaching, teachers who had some hesitation might give it a try if they knew they had other teachers to guide them. And third, I think the history of
interdisciplinary or integrated teaching has gone through so many upheavals -
from being seen positively in the 60’s, to being seen as a threat in the 70’s to
standardized testing, to the 80’s where some educators saw interdisciplinary teaching promoting the extinction of discrete disciplines. And although the reports from the Carnegie Foundation
(Turning Points: Preparing American Youth
for the 21st Century) and the National Association of Secondary
School Principals’ (NASSP), (Breaking
Ranks: Changing an American Institution) (1996) made integrated teaching gain
credibility in education circles, these documents were geared towards the
middle school and high school level.
Integrated teaching/learning in elementary schools, which have an emphasis on skills
learning seems to still be finding its place among teachers and administrators today.
I feel integrated learning allows teachers to give priority to
subjects, such as social studies and the arts, not tested in standardized
testing and still not take time away from teaching the tested subjects. Integrating subjects such as social studies
with reading and writing and math enhance those subjects and give meaning to
students to see how those subjects are used in the real world. Teaching about how to write a letter to a
government representative, read a graph about world population or read a
selection from literature about a child’s perspective in Afghanistan, allows
teachers to make skill subjects have meaning for student’s lives. Teachers shouldn’t be afraid to integrate their
teaching with other subjects that will, I think, enhance learning and create meaning for
students instead of taking away valuable learning time. Based on teaching practices of
teachers I've seen in the school today, and the emphasis on teaching to the test it
can seem like a difficult thing to teach using integrating teaching methods and
design. But I think when teachers see
the engagement and excitement of their students in learning all subjects with
integrating teaching units, they will know that real learning for life, measured by a standardized
testing, or not, is occurring.
* UbD - Understand by Design is the backward design method used to "create curriculum units and assessments that focus on developing students' understanding of important ideas" from:
.Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2010). Understanding by design: Guide to creating high quality units. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Division
.Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J. (2010). Understanding by design: Guide to creating high quality units. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Division
Excellent post! Your fears are valid and shared by many in-service teachers. However, you've recognized where your concerns are and now you have to make steps to address them. Finding the right teaching environment for you that is not highly scripted, encourages collaboration, and focuses on authenticity will be important.
ReplyDelete